I received a comment from my blog post page today about my additions to next week's Old Testament Lesson for Sunday School. This person said all nice words, but this person was a sheep in wolves clothing because this person's comments were sarcastic. This person is typical of Mormons who believe that all our manuals and scripture footnoting and referencing are "approved" by the Brethren, meaning they have examined them personally and that the manuals and footnotes, etc. are perfect and infallible as if they are the Word of God. Some Mormons may even believe that the Brethren created the manuals. I'm going to dispel this myth once and for all with some questions for Mormons:
1. How many of you have gone through each and every single footnote in the whole Quad, looking up each and every single reference?
2. If you have, then how many of you have gone through each and every single reference in each and every single manual that the Church has?
3. If you have, then I ask: How long did it take you to do all that?
A Church member pointed out an error to Elder Monson back in the day that they had found in the Book of Mormon. Elder Monson replied, "There are many errors in the Book of Mormon". He was not just referring to the text of the Book of Mormon which has been edited several times, but he was also referring to the footnotes. "Approval" does not equal "Correct".
Another Mormon Myth that has surfaced since the death of Elder Faust, who last and final talk was edited by the Church. Read or listen to his earlier talks and it is all about following the Church President, but in his last talk he changes to follow all of the Prophets and Apostles. This was edited from what I heard him say. He originally talked directly to the Apostles warning them to follow the President of the Church and not come up with their own revelations and commandments, thus was in harmony with his previous talks. Then he died and his talk was edited in text and in audio. He is not the only General Authority to have their talks edited after the fact. All those who work on the manuals and scripture footnotes are specifically, directly, and repeatedly warned, at least back in the day, to only reference the scriptures and the Conference talks of the Presidents of the Church. This is why there was a switch in Melchizedek & Relief Society lessons to have Teachings of the Prophets manuals. Anybody happen to check the reference in the Teachings of Brigham Young manual? They edited his Conference talk on the Adam-God Doctrine to instead support the Family Proclamation on one man and one woman. They edited two birds with one stone. As you can see the problem has gotten so bad in the Church that starting next year/next week Priesthood and Relief Society no longer have manuals, they bailed on doing the last one of the Teachings of President Monson. And what's worse is that the replacement lessons are that of all of the speakers at General Conference. The Church has changed their Pure Doctrine that only the President of the Church can receive revelations and commandments for the Church to all the General Authorities can receive revelations and commandments for the Church. Mormons cannot serve two masters. This is why it is so serious a condition that President Monson is no longer functioning. There's no one leading the Church!!! But yet there are all these changes going on with Monson's signature on them - he's no longer functioning!!! President Monson's Authority to act for Jesus Christ has been usurped by those without full Authority. The Brethren must wait for Monson to die before they can make ANY changes! So somewhere after 2008 the Doctrine of The Church changed and the change is not in harmony with the whole of the scriptures. The Church now needs a Constitution of Principles to ensure corruption never takes over again.
Back in 1966 in LDS April Conference, President David O. McKay gave a talk, which Elder Ezra Taft Benson told in his speech later that year that every Mormon family should have a copy of his talk. It cannot be obtained on lds.org, but I provide it here. It is just as valuable and important as the Family Proclamation or The Living Christ.
Tomorrow night at 6PM in Salt Lake City, the Super Moon will occur for the start of the New Year for 2018. Make sure to go out and see it. What is even more fascinating is that Jupiter is retrograding at the top of the Scales of Libra. It just amazes me now just how accurate the ancients were with predicting the heavenly occurrences but with their prophesies of what was to happen on Earth according to the arrangement and movements of the stars, planets, Sun and Moon. It still just boggles my mind how people can know the future so many millennia back.
Study this song and on 7 January 2018 I'll tell you all about it. The Heavenly signs just keep pouring in.
Well I see yesterday's post generated some interest finally. Good. I've decided to write the book on the Mormon Conundrum, such that there's a whole lot more about Brigham Young that the Church has omitted and covered-up such as his extermination order of the Timpanogos Tribe resulting in Fort Utah. The Church has violated the warning in Doctrine and Covenants 121 and as such I'm going on record as stating that THEREFORE the Church has lost their authority...again. It is time for the Man Child of Revelation 12 to emerge from the Church and restore all things as is prophesied in all the ancient religions before Christianity.
I overheard yesterday why my Mormon audience is gone and it is not good for Mormons because it shows their utter stupidity and their hatred for truth, which they will still give lip service that "all truth comes from God". Their excuse for no longer viewing my website is because the truth I present does not present the Church and it leaders favorably. We are at War in the prophesied latter-days!!! What makes you think everything is "well in Zion"? So let me present to you the real Mormon conundrum:
9 April 1852 General Conference - President Brigham Young gave the first account of his Adam-God Doctrine which changed the nature and character of God. (FLDS still adhere to the doctrine today)
“When our father Adam came into the garden of Eden, he came into it with a celestial body, and brought Eve, one of his wives, with him. He helped to make and organize this world. He is MICHAEL, the Archangel, the ANCIENT OF DAYS! about whom holy men have written and spoken—He is our FATHER and our GOD, and the only God with whom WE have to do. Every man upon the earth, professing Christians or non-professing, must hear it, and will know it sooner or later…I could tell you much more about this; but were I to tell you the whole truth, blasphemy would be nothing to it, in the estimation of the superstitious and over righteous mankind…. Now, let all who may hear these doctrines, pause before they make light of them, or treat them with indifference, for they will prove their salvation or damnation.”
2 October 1976 Priesthood Session General Conference - President Spencer W. Kimball denounces the Adam-God theory, but refused to attach it to Brigham Young:
"We warn you against the dissemination of doctrines which are not according to the scriptures and which are alleged to have been taught by some of the General Authorities of past generations. Such, for instance, is the Adam-God theory. We denounce that theory and hope that everyone will be cautioned against this and other kinds of false doctrine."
- Our Own Liahona
So who is right, President Brigham Young or President Spencer W. Kimball? Both spoke in General Conference, which is considered equal in authority to canonized scripture. Both cannot be right, one must be wrong. And herein lays the conundrum:
26 February 1980 - President Ezra Taft Benson gives "Fourteen Fundamentals in Following the Prophet":
First: The prophet is the only man who speaks for the Lord in everything.
Second: The living prophet is more vital to us than the Standard Works.
Third: The living prophet is more important to us than a dead prophet.
Fourth: The prophet will never lead the Church astray.
Fifth: The prophet is not required to have any particular earthly training or diplomas to speak on any subject or act on any matter at any time.
Sixth: The prophet does not have to say “Thus saith the Lord” to give us scripture.
Seventh: The prophet tells us what we need to know, not always what we want to know.
Eighth: The Prophet is not limited by men’s reasoning.
Ninth: The prophet can receive revelation on any matter—temporal or spiritual.
Tenth: The prophet may well advise on civic matters.
Eleventh: The two groups who have the greatest difficulty in following the prophet are the proud who are learned and the proud who are rich.
Twelfth: The prophet will not necessarily be popular with the world or the worldly.
Thirteenth: The prophet and his counselors make up the First Presidency—The highest quorum in the Church.
Fourteenth: The prophet and the presidency—the living prophet and the First Presidency—follow them and be blessed—reject them and suffer.
Though I have issues with these 14 "Fundamentals", the point should be clear - The Church is in great confusion over what President Young declared as the new Mormon Doctrine and as a result other new doctrines have emerged from this, such as the President's words have to be approved by the Twelve which contradicts the 1st Fundamental stated above. So either President Young or President Kimball have destroyed the Church leading the Church astray (see 4th Fundamental). Mormons cannot ignore this, or claim that this is negative or that it's anti-mormon, for this is from the Presidents of the Church over the pulpit in General Conference, the highest authority under canon scripture. And according to the 14th Fundamental, Mormons exaltation is at stake as to who they should follow. The 3rd Fundamental would suggest that President Young's doctrine is no longer valid, but then neither is Joseph Smith's or JESUS' doctrine, despite the President speaks for the Lord (1st Fundamental). President Benson just made matters worse with his 14 Fundamentals.
So Mormons won't read this post because its negativity will threaten their faith, despite the Mormon doctrine of faith is in Alma 32 starting in verse 28 which states that all words must be replicated to confirm their truth or discarded when they cannot be replicated. Yet this also threatens Mormon's concept of Authority, for how can the Church carry on after an unrighteous President whose authority is removed by God (see D&C 121:36-37). Mormons do not study...anything, not the Book of Mormon, not the words of the Presidents, not the other scriptures, not their own doctrine. This is why there is confusion and a conundrum. Having studied, I replicated the words, and thus know the answer. An unrighteous President only has authority in God's eyes for one last act of accepted authority from God, and that is to choose his replacement. (D&C 43:2-6(4))
So who did President Young choose as his replacement? It has been the tradition that the President of the Twelve replaces the dead President and in President Young's last year reorganized the Twelve so that instead of the oldest member being the President of the Twelve, it became the oldest appointed member of the Twelve. This is significant because Orson Hyde and Orson Pratt were outspoken opponents against President Young's Adam-God Doctrine, and both got dropped in ranking in the Twelve. Orson Hyde would have been the next President of the Church had he not opposed Pres. Young and got excommunicated in 1839 only to be fully restored the next month in June. Excommunications prevented President Marsh and Elder William Smith from becoming the Church President and there are some fishy details about their situation as well, which I won't get into here. This is why John Taylor became the 3rd President of the Church. Though God has allowed this process, it is not the official authoritative choosing that God recognizes. The actual authoritative chosen replacement accepted by God is found in D&C 85:7:
7 And it shall come to pass that I, the Lord God, will send one mighty and strong, holding the scepter of power in his hand, clothed with light for a covering, whose mouth shall utter words, eternal words; while his bowels shall be a fountain of truth, to set in order the house of God, and to arrange by blot the inheritances of the saints whose names are found, and the names of their fathers, and of their children, enrolled in the book of the law of God;
8 While that man, who was called of God and appointed, that putteth forth his hand to steady the bark of God, shall fall by the shaft of death, like as a tree that is smitten by the vivid shaft of lightning.
This was not put in the Doctrine and Covenants until 1876, again the year before President Young died. It is attributed to Joseph Smith, but has caused nothing but confusion, speculation, and misinterpretation since its inclusion. The truth is is that Pres. Young put it in here; it is his revelation not Joseph's. And in Brigham's mind the one mighty and strong is him, and Joseph is the "fallen" prophet in verse 8. But because of the loss of authority of Brigham Young, God turned this unrighteous scripture into Brigham's choice for his replacement. So President Joseph Fielding Smith's First Presidency Statement in 1905 about the identity of this person is wrong. The President of the Church, Presiding Bishop, or lowly Bishop does not receive a "scepter of power". This is governmental authority, but yes the first 5 Presidents were also anointed by the Council of 50 as "Kings". Presidents of the Church have keys of authority for the Kingdom of God, but the President of the Church is in verse 8. This person who is not the President of the Church will not only have government rule, but Church rule over the Presidents of the United States and the Church. He shall also "utter (eternal) words" meaning provide scripture. He will "set in order" the Temple meaning that he will restore the Temple Endowment that Brigham Young altered to conform to Freemasonry and in which originally contained his Adam-God Doctrine. And he will be involved not only with genealogy, but with assigning the Saints their homes in Independence, Missouri. To the Jews this man is Elijah, to John the Revelator he is the "Man Child", to Daniel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, and others he is the Latter-Day King on the throne of David; and to the Egyptians he is Horus the son of Osiris who takes back his father's kingdom from his Uncle Set who murdered his brother Osiris. (Jesus - Lucifer - Male Child pattern) This pattern was followed with the death of Joseph Smith and thus the Man Child/One Mighty and Strong is to take back the Authority of the Church of Jesus. Brigham did not know that this was what he was doing, but this is the Law of Moses according to Deuteronomy 19:18-19. Brigham had falsely accused Joseph of being "fallen" and justified replacing him as the King and High Priest over the Kingdom of God in the Kingdom of Deseret.
So now do you see how vital this year is and the role the Man Child is that I've been writing about? This is an exciting time of hope and joy, not one of embarrassment, cowardice, and shame in covering-up and suppressing the truth. Notice that Jupiter is in the scales of Judgement as a Judge after having emerged from the "womb" of the Church/Virgo on 23 September 2017. This is not a coincidence!!! This is real and it is happening...now!!!
In order to understand the picture you need to listen to Ezra Taft Benson's 1966 talk, "Our Immediate Responsibility" above.
There are some real evil people in the world. I'm not talking about our leaders this time. I'm talking about regular people filled with such extreme hatred toward other people. Hate does not come naturally, it has to be learned, and those who embrace it do not embrace logic and truth. What a hater spews from their words is not true and it is not logical, but they believe it so strongly that the truth to them is the evilest of lies. Having tried to reason with such people, it is impossible, for they have build a metaphoric wall around their heart and mind to "protect" them from any truth penetrating.
Just look at our politics. We really have only two parties and battle lines are drawn between them. Arguments are made based upon which party one belongs to. Do you know that your party has a platform? Do you know what your party platform is? It's all online. People will find that the majority fit in the middle between the two parties. People will agree and disagree with some platform principles from both parties, at least I would hope. But you will realize that both parties have pure evil platform principles if you step back and look at it logically and compare each party's principles to the principles of truth. Or you can compare party principles with the Constitution and also see a clear separation of both parties from the Constitution. But no one does this, they will continue to hate the other party because they are the other party and never look at their own party to see that they should be hating their own party too.
Learn and seek the TRUTH!!!